The internal structure of society is becoming increasingly more complex and full of new components involved in the definition of contemporary society. It is no longer unthinkable distinguish the various sub-social dichotomies as it was in the past. An example in this direction could be given the answers to these questions: Are there really
only two poles in politics or ways of thinking and acting are diversifying more?
There is only one body that represents and defends the rights of workers or perhaps the union is still seen as representing only the interests of a niche minority of employees? The
ways to judge the work of a ruling class or even a single only to be counted in the expression of an Ok / No? How can deprive a class leader when it ruled in the right way even if it legislates for itself?
These simple examples, I think, clearly do see a major problem plaguing modern society: the management model of the various "elements" of the constituent companies is no longer appropriate and is proving to be too simplified to meet the new needs that continue to be born in this same company. Moreover, the increasing complexity makes it difficult to human compredere, trends, new needs and new issues emerging. In short, human beings have always harder to manage the system - society. The solution to this problem will, in my opinion, when will you take on a large scale computerized methods to handle each made of real world. In a sense, it is necessary to project the real world in a virtual world that allows you to manage the reality in toto.
The human being has been shown in history and the past always unreliable and corruptible: it does not seek to amend, by of course the terms in which falls the responsibility of, the model of reality '(represented by the laws and rules) to reality of the same things constantly, but tends to distort the rules, consciously or not, in order to adapt to their own selfish needs. It 'such a tendency that inevitably leads to all civilization slow and inexorable self-destruction. At this point you might think that although this analysis, as history, moreover, has always confirmed, then we must resign ourselves to the nth destruction of civilization and the birth of a new from the ashes of the previous ... Unfortunately, things could get even more tragic, since the technological power of modern civilization itself well to self-destruct even destroy the world on which he lives is not leaving no hope for the birth of a new and better civilization, as it was in the past .
E 'then need to stop this sad inexorable course, leaving it to the machine to handle the reality within a new concept of capitalism, described by me in previous articles "bound capitalism": the only way you can' have a non-corrupt, just for the rich and the poor, responding to the needs of the citizens of the world and not only to an elite minority.
only two poles in politics or ways of thinking and acting are diversifying more?
There is only one body that represents and defends the rights of workers or perhaps the union is still seen as representing only the interests of a niche minority of employees? The
ways to judge the work of a ruling class or even a single only to be counted in the expression of an Ok / No? How can deprive a class leader when it ruled in the right way even if it legislates for itself?
These simple examples, I think, clearly do see a major problem plaguing modern society: the management model of the various "elements" of the constituent companies is no longer appropriate and is proving to be too simplified to meet the new needs that continue to be born in this same company. Moreover, the increasing complexity makes it difficult to human compredere, trends, new needs and new issues emerging. In short, human beings have always harder to manage the system - society. The solution to this problem will, in my opinion, when will you take on a large scale computerized methods to handle each made of real world. In a sense, it is necessary to project the real world in a virtual world that allows you to manage the reality in toto.
The human being has been shown in history and the past always unreliable and corruptible: it does not seek to amend, by of course the terms in which falls the responsibility of, the model of reality '(represented by the laws and rules) to reality of the same things constantly, but tends to distort the rules, consciously or not, in order to adapt to their own selfish needs. It 'such a tendency that inevitably leads to all civilization slow and inexorable self-destruction. At this point you might think that although this analysis, as history, moreover, has always confirmed, then we must resign ourselves to the nth destruction of civilization and the birth of a new from the ashes of the previous ... Unfortunately, things could get even more tragic, since the technological power of modern civilization itself well to self-destruct even destroy the world on which he lives is not leaving no hope for the birth of a new and better civilization, as it was in the past .
E 'then need to stop this sad inexorable course, leaving it to the machine to handle the reality within a new concept of capitalism, described by me in previous articles "bound capitalism": the only way you can' have a non-corrupt, just for the rich and the poor, responding to the needs of the citizens of the world and not only to an elite minority.
Probably, one day, the laws and constitution will be described in the form of an algorithm or flow chart in order to avoid any distortion or misunderstanding of the law this way every vigente.In "algorithm legislative will 'known to all in test any possible illegal modification.
0 comments:
Post a Comment